Source-tracked model comparison

How do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs compare for long documents?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for long-document analysis. The cost example uses a document summarization workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is estimated at $1,740.00 per month and Gemini 2.5 Pro at $818.75 for 50,000 input tokens, 2,500 output tokens, and 10,000 monthly requests. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $921.25 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
high priorityactiveSources checked 2026-07-12 / 2026-07-12
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

FieldClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
API model IDclaude-sonnet-4-6gemini-2.5-pro
Input / 1M$3.00$1.25
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.125
Output / 1M$15.00$10.00
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output128,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Accepted inputtext, imagetext, image, video, audio, pdf
Example workload

Document summarization cost scenario

50,000 input and 2,500 output tokens per request, 10,000 monthly requests, and 10% cached input.

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6

$1,740.00 / month
Input cost
$1,365.00
Output cost
$375.00
Per 1,000 calls
$174.00
Pricing profile
standard
View model details
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$818.75 / month
Input cost
$568.75
Output cost
$250.00
Per 1,000 calls
$81.88
Pricing profile
standard / short context
View model details

Cost result: Gemini 2.5 Pro is $921.25 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Which model preserves the facts required by the summary?
  • Does prompt size trigger a higher tracked pricing tier?
  • How much output is needed for the intended document type?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

OCR, file ingestion, multimodal document processing, and multi-pass summarization are not included.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.