Source-tracked model comparison

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-4o Mini: what changes in API cost for developer assistance?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for moving a compact OpenAI workload from GPT-4o Mini to GPT-5.4 Mini. The cost example uses a developer assistant backend workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: GPT-4o mini is estimated at $78.75 per month and gpt-5.4-mini at $491.25 for 5,000 input tokens, 1,500 output tokens, and 50,000 monthly requests. GPT-4o mini is $412.50 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
Generation changeDeveloper assistant backendSources checked 2026-07-13 / 2026-07-13
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

FieldGPT-4o minigpt-5.4-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
API model IDgpt-4o-minigpt-5.4-mini
Input / 1M$0.15$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.075$0.075
Output / 1M$0.60$4.50
Context window128,000 tokens400,000 tokens
Maximum output16,384 tokens128,000 tokens
Accepted inputtext, imagetext, image
Example workload

Developer assistant backend cost scenario

5,000 input and 1,500 output tokens per request, 50,000 monthly requests, and 20% cached input.

OpenAI

GPT-4o mini

$78.75 / month
Input cost
$33.75
Output cost
$45.00
Per 1,000 calls
$1.575
Pricing profile
standard
View model details
OpenAI

gpt-5.4-mini

$491.25 / month
Input cost
$153.75
Output cost
$337.50
Per 1,000 calls
$9.825
Pricing profile
standard / short context
View model details

Cost result: GPT-4o mini is $412.50 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Does GPT-5.4 Mini reduce retries on the target coding tasks?
  • Which existing GPT-4o Mini prompts require migration changes?
  • Does the measured quality change justify the tracked price difference?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

The calculation does not compare coding quality and excludes indexing, execution sandboxes, and repository storage.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.