Source-tracked model comparison

Which costs less for controlled generation: GPT-5.6 Luna or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for controlled generation with moderate context. The cost example uses a email drafting workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: gpt-5.6-luna is estimated at $464.00 per month and Claude Haiku 4.5 at $414.00 for 2,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, and 100,000 monthly requests. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $50.00 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
low priorityobserveSources checked 2026-07-13 / 2026-07-12
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

Fieldgpt-5.6-lunaClaude Haiku 4.5
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
API model IDgpt-5.6-lunaclaude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Input / 1M$1.00$1.00
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.10
Output / 1M$6.00$5.00
Context window1,050,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Maximum output128,000 tokens64,000 tokens
Accepted inputtext, imagetext, image
Example workload

Email drafting cost scenario

2,000 input and 500 output tokens per request, 100,000 monthly requests, and 20% cached input.

OpenAI

gpt-5.6-luna

$464.00 / month
Input cost
$164.00
Output cost
$300.00
Per 1,000 calls
$4.64
Pricing profile
standard / short context
View model details
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

$414.00 / month
Input cost
$164.00
Output cost
$250.00
Per 1,000 calls
$4.14
Pricing profile
standard
View model details

Cost result: Claude Haiku 4.5 is $50.00 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Which model follows the required tone and output constraints?
  • Does either provider simplify privacy review?
  • What regeneration rate appears in a realistic trial?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

Deliverability, CRM, enrichment, and human review costs are not included.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.