Source-tracked model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-5.6 Sol: how do access, context, and API cost differ?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for current and previous OpenAI flagship API cost. The cost example uses a long-context research workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: GPT-6 Astra is estimated at $3,230.00 per month and GPT-5.6 Sol at $1,292.00 for 150,000 input tokens, 5,000 output tokens, and 2,000 monthly requests. GPT-5.6 Sol is $1,938.00 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
Generation changeLong-context researchSources checked 2026-09-08 / 2026-09-08
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

FieldGPT-6 AstraGPT-5.6 Sol
API access providerOpenAIOpenAI
API model IDgpt-6-astragpt-5.6-sol
Input / 1M$10.00$4.00
Cached input / 1M$1.00$0.40
Output / 1M$50.00$20.00
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Maximum output128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Accepted inputtext, imagetext, image
Example workload

Long-context research cost scenario

150,000 input and 5,000 output tokens per request, 2,000 monthly requests, and 10% cached input.

OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra

$3,230.00 / month
Input cost
$2,730.00
Output cost
$500.00
Per 1,000 calls
$1,615.00
Pricing profile
standard / short context
View model details
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

$1,292.00 / month
Input cost
$1,092.00
Output cost
$200.00
Per 1,000 calls
$646.00
Pricing profile
standard / short context
View model details

Cost result: GPT-5.6 Sol is $1,938.00 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Does the workload need GPT-6 Astra access and capabilities?
  • How does the 272,000-token pricing boundary change monthly cost?
  • Does GPT-5.6 Sol still meet the quality requirement on representative inputs?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

Models whose tracked context window is below the scenario input are excluded from the compatible-model table.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.