Source-tracked model comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Sonnet 4.6: what is the cost difference for document summarization?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for routing long-document work across Claude premium tiers. The cost example uses a document summarization workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: Claude Opus 4.8 is estimated at $2,900.00 per month and Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $1,740.00 for 50,000 input tokens, 2,500 output tokens, and 10,000 monthly requests. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $1,160.00 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
Same-provider alternativesDocument summarizationSources checked 2026-07-12 / 2026-07-12
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

FieldClaude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 4.6
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
API model IDclaude-opus-4-8claude-sonnet-4-6
Input / 1M$5.00$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.50$0.30
Output / 1M$25.00$15.00
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Maximum output128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Accepted inputtext, imagetext, image
Example workload

Document summarization cost scenario

50,000 input and 2,500 output tokens per request, 10,000 monthly requests, and 10% cached input.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

$2,900.00 / month
Input cost
$2,275.00
Output cost
$625.00
Per 1,000 calls
$290.00
Pricing profile
standard
View model details
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6

$1,740.00 / month
Input cost
$1,365.00
Output cost
$375.00
Per 1,000 calls
$174.00
Pricing profile
standard
View model details

Cost result: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $1,160.00 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Which documents require the premium tier?
  • Can factuality checks trigger selective escalation?
  • How much output is needed for the target summary?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

OCR, file ingestion, multimodal document processing, and multi-pass summarization are not included.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.