Source-tracked model comparison

Which has lower API cost for support triage: DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for low-cost operational automation. The cost example uses a support ticket triage workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: DeepSeek V4 Flash non-thinking is estimated at $54.57 per month and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite at $52.38 for 1,500 input tokens, 250 output tokens, and 250,000 monthly requests. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $2.19 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
medium priorityactiveSources checked 2026-07-12 / 2026-07-12
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

FieldDeepSeek V4 Flash non-thinkingGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
API model IDdeepseek-v4-flashgemini-2.5-flash-lite
Input / 1M$0.14$0.10
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.01
Output / 1M$0.28$0.40
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output384,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Accepted inputtexttext, image, video, audio, pdf
Example workload

Support ticket triage cost scenario

1,500 input and 250 output tokens per request, 250,000 monthly requests, and 30% cached input.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash non-thinking

$54.57 / month
Input cost
$37.07
Output cost
$17.50
Per 1,000 calls
$0.2183
Pricing profile
standard / cache miss
View model details
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

$52.38 / month
Input cost
$27.38
Output cost
$25.00
Per 1,000 calls
$0.2095
Pricing profile
standard / text
View model details

Cost result: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $2.19 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Which provider fits regional and procurement requirements?
  • Do both models satisfy the required schema and latency target?
  • How much traffic needs escalation after a real trial?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

This estimate covers generation tokens only and does not assume equal routing accuracy between models.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.