Source-tracked model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: which costs less for batch document processing?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for high-volume document processing across DeepSeek and Gemini. The cost example uses a high-volume document processing workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: deepseek-v4-pro is estimated at $393.24 per month and Gemini 2.5 Flash at $455.40 for 12,000 input tokens, 900 output tokens, and 100,000 monthly requests. deepseek-v4-pro is $62.16 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
Current provider alternativesHigh-volume document processingSources checked 2026-07-12 / 2026-07-12
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

Fielddeepseek-v4-proGemini 2.5 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
API model IDdeepseek-v4-progemini-2.5-flash
Input / 1M$0.435$0.30
Cached input / 1M$0.0036$0.03
Output / 1M$0.87$2.50
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output384,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Accepted inputtexttext, image, video, audio
Example workload

High-volume document processing cost scenario

12,000 input and 900 output tokens per request, 100,000 monthly requests, and 40% cached input.

DeepSeek

deepseek-v4-pro

$393.24 / month
Input cost
$314.94
Output cost
$78.30
Per 1,000 calls
$3.9324
Pricing profile
standard / cache miss
View model details
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

$455.40 / month
Input cost
$230.40
Output cost
$225.00
Per 1,000 calls
$4.554
Pricing profile
standard / text
View model details

Cost result: deepseek-v4-pro is $62.16 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Which records need a more capable fallback?
  • How much repeated context can be cached?
  • What retry rate appears at the intended concurrency?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

Displayed totals use each model's verified default profile; provider batch discounts are not automatically applied.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.