Gemini 2.5 Pro
$441.25 / month- Input cost
- $341.25
- Output cost
- $100.00
- Per 1,000 calls
- $220.63
- Pricing profile
- standard / short context
Source-tracked model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: which costs less for a practical API workload?
Compare verified pricing and model limits for routing within the Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite family. The cost example uses a long-context research workload and does not assume equal model quality.
Direct cost answer: Gemini 2.5 Pro is estimated at $441.25 per month and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at $83.25 for 150,000 input tokens, 5,000 output tokens, and 2,000 monthly requests. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is $358.00 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
Tracked facts
Pricing and model limits
Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.
| Field | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-pro | gemini-3.1-flash-lite |
| Input / 1M | $1.25 | $0.25 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.125 | $0.025 |
| Output / 1M | $10.00 | $1.50 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Maximum output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Accepted input | text, image, video, audio, pdf | text, image, audio |
Example workload
Long-context research cost scenario
150,000 input and 5,000 output tokens per request, 2,000 monthly requests, and 10% cached input.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
$83.25 / month- Input cost
- $68.25
- Output cost
- $15.00
- Per 1,000 calls
- $41.63
- Pricing profile
- standard
Cost result: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is $358.00 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.
Questions to answer before choosing
- Which model meets the required quality threshold on representative inputs?
- How do output length, retries, and caching change the measured cost?
- Which provider and deployment path fit the team's operational requirements?
What this estimate leaves out
Models whose tracked context window is below the scenario input are excluded from the compatible-model table.
Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.
Related active comparisons
Continue with a nearby model decision
These comparisons share a model or provider decision with this page.
context
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
How do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs compare for long documents?
Compare API cost same familyGemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
How much does Gemini 2.5 Pro cost compared with Gemini 2.5 Flash for RAG?
Compare API cost contextGPT-4o vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
How do GPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs compare for document workloads?
Compare API cost