Source-tracked model comparison

How do GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs compare for long-context research?

Compare verified pricing and model limits for large-context research workloads. The cost example uses a long-context research workload and does not assume equal model quality.

Direct cost answer: GPT-5.6 Sol is estimated at $1,292.00 per month and Gemini 2.5 Pro at $441.25 for 150,000 input tokens, 5,000 output tokens, and 2,000 monthly requests. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $850.75 lower under these assumptions. This does not identify a quality winner.
Cross-provider comparisonLong-context researchSources checked 2026-09-08 / 2026-08-26
Tracked facts

Pricing and model limits

Prices are USD per 1M tokens under each model's verified default profile.

FieldGPT-5.6 SolGemini 2.5 Pro
API access providerOpenAIGoogle
API model IDgpt-5.6-solgemini-2.5-pro
Input / 1M$4.00$1.25
Cached input / 1M$0.40$0.125
Output / 1M$20.00$10.00
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output128,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Accepted inputtext, imagetext, image, video, audio, pdf
Example workload

Long-context research cost scenario

150,000 input and 5,000 output tokens per request, 2,000 monthly requests, and 10% cached input.

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

$1,292.00 / month
Input cost
$1,092.00
Output cost
$200.00
Per 1,000 calls
$646.00
Pricing profile
standard / short context
View model details
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$441.25 / month
Input cost
$341.25
Output cost
$100.00
Per 1,000 calls
$220.63
Pricing profile
standard / short context
View model details

Cost result: Gemini 2.5 Pro is $850.75 lower per month for these assumptions. This is a price comparison, not a model-quality ranking.

StackLens assessment

Questions to answer before choosing

  • Does the full input fit within each tracked context window?
  • How are citations and source coverage evaluated?
  • Do provider-specific long-context rates change the expected total?
Workload caveat

What this estimate leaves out

Models whose tracked context window is below the scenario input are excluded from the compatible-model table.

Latency, reliability, output quality, retries, regional processing, and provider-specific tool charges can change the practical decision.